EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL CONTEXT ON HIPPOCAMPAL 'PLACE FIELDS'
Etan J. Markus1, Yulin Qin1, Brian Leonard5, William E. Skaggs1, Bruce L. McNaughton1,2,4, and Carol A. Barnes1,2,3
Rat hippocampal
place cells exhibit little or no directional tuning when recorded in a
high walled cylinder while the rat forages for randomly dispersed food
(Muller et al., 1987; Muller et. al., 1994) . On radial arm mazes
and other tasks, however, place cells show a strong directional selectivity
within their place fields (e.g., McNaughton et al., 1983a; Muller
et. al., 1994). These experiments differ in a number of respects,
including, the visual environment, configuration of the traversable
space, behavior (e.g., mean linear and angular velocities), and behavioral
context (e.g., whether reinforcement is located in specific places rather
than distributed randomly). The contribution of these factors to
place field directionality was systematically examined in the present study.
Cells were recorded from rats in either an enriched or a sparse visual
environment, doing one of two behavioral tasks, and on a radial maze or
on a platform.
Place fields
were smaller, more specific, and exhibited greater directional selectivity
on radial mazes than on a circular platform, regardless of the visual environment.
On the open platform, place fields were more directional when the rat searched
for food in a stereotypic and directed manner than when the search was
for randomly scattered food. Thus, it seems that place fields are
more directional when the animal is planning or following a specific trajectory,
and hence possibly related to the frame of reference attended to in navigation.
The change
in behavioral task was accompanied by a change in the location of the place
fields in about one third of the cells. Thus place cells encode
not only information about a location in a given environment, but are affected
by the significance of that location and/or the type of behavior needed
for performance of the task.